Viewing Period:
Run Time:
2 Hours, 21 Minutes
Starring:
Director:
Writer:
Producer:
Released in:
2004
Synopsis:
Musical Drama based on Andrew Lloyd Webber's celebrated musical phenomenon. The Phantom of the Opera tells the story of a disfigured musical genius (GERARD BUTLER) who haunts the catacombs beneath the Paris Opera, waging a reign of terror over its occupants. When he falls fatally in love with the lovely Christine (EMMY ROSSUM), the Phantom devotes himself to creating a new star for the Opera, exerting a strange sense of control over the young soprano as he nurtures her extraordinary talents.
Copyright:
(c) 2004 Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Will Your Device Play this Video?
- Computer
- Windows
SD(standard definition): Plays as a download or instant stream.
HD(High definition): Not available on this computer.
Macintosh
SD(standard definition): Plays as an instant stream only.
HD(High definition): Not available for playback on this computer.
- TV_end
CinemaNow customers also watched:
CRITIC REVIEWS
Lew Irwin

It has been 81 years since the original silent version of The Phantom of the Opera appeared. What we have now is the loud version, critics suggest. Relentless bombast afflicts this movie like a bad case of swollen lymph nodes, writes A.O. Scott in the New York Times. Wesley Morris in the Boston Globe observes that although the songs are credited to Andrew Lloyd Webber, come crashing through the speakers with such punishing force that it wouldn't be wrong to think Jerry Bruckheimer might have written them. Bob Strauss in the Los Angeles Daily News remarks that it is all crescendo for two relentless hours. Several critics, however, figure that the loudness may be necessary to keep audiences awake. Lou Lumenick in the New York Post observes that the famous falling chandelier has been moved from the end of the first act to the climax of the movie -- by which point non-devotees may need to be roused from their sleep by their companions. Carina Chocano in the Los Angeles Times calls it a slow-moving orgy of lowbrow grandiosity that's as tedious as it is overblown and pretentious. Yet several critics suggest that the original stage musical survived many of the critical barbs that are currently being directed at the movie. Eleanor Ringel Gillespie in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, for example, notes that Fans will swoon and weep; nonfans, should they accidentally find themselves in the same room with it, will snicker and snooze. And many critics agree that the movie looks a whole lot better than the music in it sounds. The look is dazzling, writes Claudia Puig in USA Today. Even the clutter is beautiful, adds Philip Wuntch in the Dallas Morning News. Indeed, Roger Ebert in the Chicago Sun-Times appears willing to give the movie a thumbs-up on looks alone. He concludes: This has been, I realize, a

Reviewed by: RenaX on 9/21/2005 9:35:06 AM
I normally didn't like opera and movies with musicals. But I really liked this one. The music was really beautiful. I think Gerard Butler did a great job portraying the phantom. It inspired me to go out and buy the soundtrack to this movie. Loved it!
Lew Irwin

It has been 81 years since the original silent version of The Phantom of the Opera appeared. What we have now is the loud version, critics suggest. Relentless bombast afflicts this movie like a bad case of swollen lymph nodes, writes A.O. Scott in the New York Times. Wesley Morris in the Boston Globe observes that although the songs are credited to Andrew Lloyd Webber, come crashing through the speakers with such punishing force that it wouldn't be wrong to think Jerry Bruckheimer might have written them. Bob Strauss in the Los Angeles Daily News remarks that it is all crescendo for two relentless hours. Several critics, however, figure that the loudness may be necessary to keep audiences awake. Lou Lumenick in the New York Post observes that the famous falling chandelier has been moved from the end of the first act to the climax of the movie -- by which point non-devotees may need to be roused from their sleep by their companions. Carina Chocano in the Los Angeles Times calls it a slow-moving orgy of lowbrow grandiosity that's as tedious as it is overblown and pretentious. Yet several critics suggest that the original stage musical survived many of the critical barbs that are currently being directed at the movie. Eleanor Ringel Gillespie in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, for example, notes that Fans will swoon and weep; nonfans, should they accidentally find themselves in the same room with it, will snicker and snooze. And many critics agree that the movie looks a whole lot better than the music in it sounds. The look is dazzling, writes Claudia Puig in USA Today. Even the clutter is beautiful, adds Philip Wuntch in the Dallas Morning News. Indeed, Roger Ebert in the Chicago Sun-Times appears willing to give the movie a thumbs-up on looks alone. He concludes: This has been, I realize, a nutty review. I am recommending a movie that I do not seem to like very much. But part of the pleasure of moviegoing is pure spectacle -- of just sitting there and looking at great stuff and knowing it looks terrific.
Reviewed by: RenaX on 9/21/2005 9:35:06 AM
I normally didn't like opera and movies with musicals. But I really liked this one. The music was really beautiful. I think Gerard Butler did a great job portraying the phantom. It inspired me to go out and buy the soundtrack to this movie. Loved it!
The Phantom of the Opera (2004) has 25 user ratings.
Customer Reviews for
The Phantom of the Opera (2004)
Write a Review (max 1000 characters):
Please Note: If you have already reviewed this movie, your
new review will update your original review.
Reviewed by: RenaX on 9/21/2005 9:35:06 AM
I normally didn't like opera and movies with musicals. But I really liked this one. The music was really beautiful. I think Gerard Butler did a great job portraying the phantom. It inspired me to go out and buy the soundtrack to this movie. Loved it!
(Read More Customer Reviews...)Reviewed by: skehring on 8/15/2005 7:01:23 PM
I enjoyed this movie, as I enjoy musicals. Recommended for people who like to hear people sing, and opera.I liked the play, and the movie helped make it easier for me to follow the story line.Very nice music, and acting done well. Nice PTO.
Reviewed by: just88in on 7/8/2005 4:07:31 AM
Andrew Lloyd Webber had done an excellent job recreating his famous love story. The characters are beautifully cast and Emily shines as Christine Daea.
Reviewed by: raw557 on 7/4/2005 12:55:18 PM
Reviewed by: kjk5500 on 6/30/2005 7:56:38 PM
A true classic! Beautiful love story! Definetly a chick flick. I dont normally like musicals, but I enjoyed this one! Worth seeing.
System Requirements
Streaming
- OS: Windows XP, Vista or Windows 7 / Mac OS X
- Browser: IE 7 and higher / Firefox 3.6 and higher/ Safari 4 and higher / Google Chrome
- Adobe Flash player (10.3 or higher)
- Broadband Internet connection such as DSL or Cable Modem
Download
- OS: Windows XP, Vista or Windows 7
- Windows Media Player 10 or higher
- Browser: IE 7 and higher / Firefox 3.6 and higher
- For playback of downloaded HD titles, i3, i5 or i7 Intel Core processor chip / Intel Insider required
- Broadband Internet connection such as DSL or Cable Modem
Video File Info:
- Download: 2200 Kbps (kilo bits per second)
- Stream: 2000 Kbps with adaptive setting
- Approximate file size for download: 1.5GB
- Sound: Stereo
- Premium movies are of superior playback quality. This is a larger file. A higher speed broadband connection is recommended and the ability to play the movie while it is downloading may take longer
MORE INFORMATION:
Screen Format: Color
Language: English