| | |
|
| You Pay | $2.99 | Viewing Period: 24 hours
|
Download
|
|
| | |
Plays on:

Average Customer Rating:

Synopsis:
In an alternate turn-of-the-century fictional reality, Queen Victoria assembles some of the greatest criminal legends of the time to team up for a secret mission.
MORE INFORMATION
Screen Format: Color
CRITIC REVIEWS
Lew Irwin

On ABC's Good Morning America critic Joel Siegel led off his review of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen by remarking on the extraordinary acting talent of one of its stars, Sean Connery. I'd pay to watch him read the morning paper and drink a cup of coffee, Siegel commented, then added: I'd rather do [that] than watch The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, which Siegel described as every action movie this summer lumped together in one big ... lump. His colleagues in the print media mostly agree. Roger Ebert in the Chicago Sun-Times calls the lump a mixture of incomprehensible action, idiotic dialogue, inexplicable motivations, causes without effects, effects without causes, and general lunacy. What a mess. Geoff Pevere in the Toronto Star advises: Transpose just about any of the reasonable complaints one might have about 90 per cent of the big budget studio releases currently, recently or imminently in release (i.e., that they're underwritten, overblown, forgettable, illogical, irrelevant, intellectually-challenged and yet eager to reproduce) and you've pretty much captured the essence of this joyless, lurching behemoth. Megan Lehmann in the New York Post counters the highfalutin title with a highfalutin description: unfathomable balderdash. Carrie Rickey in the Philadelphia Inquirer describes it as the unwatchable in pursuit of the inexplicable. Stephen Hunter in the Washington Post even has rancorous words about Connery. He confines most of his acting to his left eyebrow and his right fist; they're his only body parts that seem engaged. In all other respects, his performance must be modeled on Darrell Hammond's brilliant impersonations of him on Saturday Night Live as arrogant and stupid but also stubborn and boring, Hunter writes. And Manohla Dargis in the Los Angeles Times expresses

Reviewed by: frankburch1973 on 10/3/2008 9:40:40 PM
i thought this movie was a lot of fun and so did my son. entertaining. this movie obviously was big flop I think. I've heard a lot of people hate it. I'm not sure. I thought how they kind of threw all these weird legends and heroes into the same story and turned it into an action adventure, while the whole time making it a detective story was actually pretty cool. I think it didn't have anything in this movie like an X-MAN so that people were afraid to like it (people don't really think for themselves, do they?) The character Captain Nemo was a funny choice for a hero. anyway, for a good time, rent this movie. great to watch with teenage son.
Lew Irwin

On ABC's Good Morning America critic Joel Siegel led off his review of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen by remarking on the extraordinary acting talent of one of its stars, Sean Connery. I'd pay to watch him read the morning paper and drink a cup of coffee, Siegel commented, then added: I'd rather do [that] than watch The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, which Siegel described as every action movie this summer lumped together in one big ... lump. His colleagues in the print media mostly agree. Roger Ebert in the Chicago Sun-Times calls the lump a mixture of incomprehensible action, idiotic dialogue, inexplicable motivations, causes without effects, effects without causes, and general lunacy. What a mess. Geoff Pevere in the Toronto Star advises: Transpose just about any of the reasonable complaints one might have about 90 per cent of the big budget studio releases currently, recently or imminently in release (i.e., that they're underwritten, overblown, forgettable, illogical, irrelevant, intellectually-challenged and yet eager to reproduce) and you've pretty much captured the essence of this joyless, lurching behemoth. Megan Lehmann in the New York Post counters the highfalutin title with a highfalutin description: unfathomable balderdash. Carrie Rickey in the Philadelphia Inquirer describes it as the unwatchable in pursuit of the inexplicable. Stephen Hunter in the Washington Post even has rancorous words about Connery. He confines most of his acting to his left eyebrow and his right fist; they're his only body parts that seem engaged. In all other respects, his performance must be modeled on Darrell Hammond's brilliant impersonations of him on Saturday Night Live as arrogant and stupid but also stubborn and boring, Hunter writes. And Manohla Dargis in the Los Angeles Times expresses her exasperation with the recent glut of blockbuster action films by kicking off her review this way: It's axiomatic among film critics that the movies have gone to the dogs, or more precisely to teenage boys. Given the current crop of cheerlessly noisy entertainments, such bitterness is understandable, but then again it's summer. Summer is the critics' season of discontent, the time when movies seem coarser, louder and held hostage by stories simple enough to wrap around a slab of Bazooka bubble gum. In fact, the film has a few admirers. Eleanor Ringel Gillespie in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution describes it as a lightning-paced period adventure, dotted with some off-hand literary references to coax a smile out of book-loving moviegoers.
Reviewed by: frankburch1973 on 10/3/2008 9:40:40 PM
i thought this movie was a lot of fun and so did my son. entertaining. this movie obviously was big flop I think. I've heard a lot of people hate it. I'm not sure. I thought how they kind of threw all these weird legends and heroes into the same story and turned it into an action adventure, while the whole time making it a detective story was actually pretty cool. I think it didn't have anything in this movie like an X-MAN so that people were afraid to like it (people don't really think for themselves, do they?) The character Captain Nemo was a funny choice for a hero. anyway, for a good time, rent this movie. great to watch with teenage son.
The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen has 20 user ratings.
Customer Reviews for
The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen
Write a Review (max 1000 characters):
Please Note: If you have already reviewed this movie, your
new review will update your original review.
Reviewed by: frankburch1973 on 10/3/2008 9:40:40 PM
i thought this movie was a lot of fun and so did my son. entertaining. this movie obviously was big flop I think. I've heard a lot of people hate it. I'm not sure. I thought how they kind of threw all these weird legends and heroes into the same story and turned it into an action adventure, while the whole time making it a detective story was actually pretty cool. I think it didn't have anything in this movie like an X-MAN so that people were afraid to like it (people don't really think for themselves, do they?) The character Captain Nemo was a funny choice for a hero. anyway, for a good time, rent this movie. great to watch with teenage son.
(Read More Customer Reviews...)Reviewed by: estee498 on 7/2/2007 2:05:33 PM
Reviewed by: goingstrong on 1/17/2007 7:18:03 PM
Excellent movie!!! It's kinda like one of the Marvel type fantastic four movies, not what I expected, but way, way better.I really enjoyed it. A real thunbs up from me!!!
Reviewed by: jimbug on 10/15/2006 5:44:37 AM
This movie stunk. I like sean connery but this was his worst movie. Every thing was so fake looking and wasnt exiting at all. booooooooooooooo
Reviewed by: zazen2004 on 10/8/2006 1:34:00 AM
Sometimes a movie can be just anything - even pure fantasy. That's all one can say to describe this film. It makes no sense, has no message, is totally unrealistic, and best of all - it works. Do not read any other reviews because they will only spoil the sensation of unrestrained, action packed, imagination. Have fun.
Reviewed by: jelly15 on 9/4/2006 4:39:28 PM
Love the action. Great CG and special effects.Could have been better.
System Requirements
- Windows Media Player 10 or higher
- Windows XP or Vista
- Internet Explorer 6.0 or higher
- Firefox 2.0 or higher
- High-Speed Internet (DSL or better) connection
Video File Info:
Download
Approximate file size: 1.5GB
Sound: Stereo
Premium movies are of superior playback quality. This is a larger file. A higher speed broadband connection is recommended and the ability to Play the movie while it is downloading may take longer.